| Composite fit | 18 | — | 0.5 |
| Why: Vendor's capabilities are almost entirely IT/software development, while the solicitation requires civil engineering advisory, facility management, installation strategy, and logistics support for PACAF bases across the Indo-Pacific. |
| Technical fit | 10 | fail | 0.3 |
| Why: Cloud-native development, AI/ML, and web frameworks have no meaningful alignment with the civil engineering, readiness/sustainment, environmental management, and installation support services explicitly required by this IDIQ. |
| Financial fit | 45 | pass | 0.2 |
| Why: A multi-award IDIQ of this scope is likely large enough to be financially workable, but contract-size fit is moot when technical alignment is this weak. |